” there is a burden of evidence to conquer there”
We have been perhaps not the common regarding the 5 individuals we spend time that is most with.
We are the typical regarding the 5 ideas we spend many time with.
And the ones ideas needn’t come escort Las Vegas from people inside our life.
In medical sectors, they joke as they sound) that you can append “. in mice” to almost any media headline about a new study that вЂњdiscovered XYZвЂќ (implying that some important steps are missing and things arenвЂ™t as simple.
In investing, the same would be to add “. that youвЂ™re telling others about for me” to whatever process or system you’ve found that works and. This might be for they have a different hardware (personality/brain wired differently) and different data on their hard-drives (different life experiences, knowledge base) because they likely can’t just run that software successfully,вЂ¦
The vice versa applies when you learn about exactly what others did, you can mentally include “. for you” to it.
This doesn’t mean it can’t do the job.
Exactly that there exists a burden of proof to conquer here, and that you could need to modify it (recompile it after some tweaks?) so that it operates all on your own certain mind-hardware.
Nearly all my favorite finance/investing people tilt way more ‘collaborative’ than ‘competitive’ with peers (no body is 100% one or the other, but they tilt heavily that way).
I do not think it’s just that they are nicer; an advantage is got by them through the greater velocity of trade of some ideas, feedback, connections, resources they are able to ask, etc, therefore itвЂ™s shrewd too.